-->

Tips cantik dan sehat menyajikan berbagai info kecantikan, kesehatan,dan tentang wanita.

Home » Penelusuran politics and government
Kwon Young-guk of Justice Party Receives Suspended Sentence

Kwon Young-guk of Justice Party Receives Suspended Sentence

Background of the Case

Kwon Young-guk, a prominent figure in the Justice Party, has recently been sentenced to a suspended six-month prison term following a trial that lasted over a decade. The case stems from events during a rally held under the Park Geun-hye administration in 2015. Kwon was charged with multiple offenses, including obstructing vehicle traffic and assaulting a police officer.

The sentencing occurred on the 9th of last month by Judge Choi Ji-yeon of the 9th Criminal Division of the Seoul Central District Court. The charges against Kwon included violations of the Assembly and Demonstration Act, obstruction of official duties, and general traffic obstruction. This ruling marks the first trial after approximately 10 years of legal proceedings.

Details of the Alleged Offenses

Kwon was indicted for allegedly exceeding the reported number of participants and conducting an unregistered march during the “Resolution Rally to Stop Labor Reform” held in the Cheonggyecheon area of Jung-gu, Seoul, on September 23, 2015. During this event, he ignored the police’s dispersal order, which led to charges under the Assembly Act. Additionally, Kwon was accused of striking a police officer twice on the head with his hand while the officer was performing crowd control duties.

On September 19 of the same year, Kwon faced further charges related to general traffic obstruction. He was alleged to have occupied all lanes in both directions of the Jongno 3-ga intersection with around 3,000 rally participants during the “Resolution Rally to Stop Structural Labor Market Reform” held in the same area of Seoul.

Legal Proceedings and Trial

The prosecution referred Kwon to trial in 2018 on charges of obstruction of official duties, violation of the Assembly and Demonstration Act, and general traffic obstruction. During the trial, Kwon denied the charge of assaulting the police officer, claiming that the incident occurred while he was waving his arm to block tear gas during a protest against what he considered an unjust dispersal of the rally.

However, the court found Kwon guilty of assaulting the police officer based on the officer’s testimony and video evidence. It also determined that he violated the Assembly Act. Despite these findings, the court acquitted him of the general traffic obstruction charge, stating that he was merely a passive participant in the event.

Judicial Ruling and Implications

In its ruling, the court acknowledged the importance of freedom of assembly and demonstration in a democratic society, emphasizing the need to protect socially vulnerable groups. However, it also stressed that these rights are not absolute and must be exercised without infringing upon or threatening the legal order of the state and the freedom of ordinary citizens.

The court's decision highlights the delicate balance between protecting individual rights and maintaining public order. While the ruling recognizes the significance of peaceful protests, it also underscores the necessity of adhering to legal frameworks to ensure that such activities do not disrupt the broader social and legal environment.

Conclusion

The case of Kwon Young-guk serves as a significant example of the legal challenges faced by political figures involved in public demonstrations. The court's decision reflects the complexities of balancing individual freedoms with the responsibilities of maintaining public order. As the Justice Party continues to navigate its role in Korean politics, this case may influence future discussions on the boundaries of protest and the legal implications of political activism.

Trump unveils major breakthrough as Israel and Hamas finalize peace plan phase

Trump unveils major breakthrough as Israel and Hamas finalize peace plan phase

Trump unveils major breakthrough as Israel and Hamas finalize peace plan phase

A New Dawn in the Middle East

In a remarkable diplomatic development, U.S. President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that Israel and Hamas had reached an agreement on the initial phase of a peace framework, aiming to bring an end to the ongoing conflict in Gaza and secure the release of all hostages. This breakthrough marks a significant step towards resolving one of the most enduring and complex conflicts in the region.

Trump shared the news during a White House event, where he received a handwritten note from Secretary of State Marco Rubio. He revealed that both parties had endorsed the first stage of what he described as “a strong, durable, and everlasting peace.” According to Trump’s statement on Truth Social, this means that all hostages will be released soon, and Israel will withdraw its troops to an agreed-upon line.

“All parties will be treated fairly. This is a great day for the Arab and Muslim world, Israel, all surrounding nations, and the United States of America. Blessed are the peacemakers!” Trump wrote.

Key Components of the Peace Framework

According to White House officials, the framework was developed after extensive talks involving Qatar, Egypt, Turkey, and U.S. negotiators. The plan is expected to be implemented in stages, with the release of Israeli hostages and Palestinian prisoners forming the first step. Israeli sources have indicated that the hostages are expected to return home this weekend.

Following Trump’s announcement, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu confirmed that he would convene his cabinet on Thursday to ratify the deal. He called it “a great day for Israel” and pledged, “With God’s help, we will bring them all home.”

Behind the Scenes: The Final Push

Behind the scenes, sources mentioned that the final push for the agreement came after a high-level meeting in Egypt’s Sharm el-Sheikh. The meeting included U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff, Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, and intelligence chiefs from Egypt, Turkey, and Israel. Reports of progress intensified throughout the day, culminating in Rubio slipping a note to Trump indicating that the deal was imminent.

A Qatari official later confirmed that “all provisions and implementation mechanisms” of the first phase had been agreed upon. This paves the way for an end to the war, the release of detainees, and the entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza.

Hamas’ Response

In an unusually conciliatory statement, Hamas thanked Qatar, Egypt, and Turkey for their mediation efforts and specifically acknowledged Trump for his role in brokering the breakthrough. The group stated, “We value the efforts of U.S. President Donald Trump, who seeks to bring about a definitive end to the war and a complete withdrawal of the occupation from Gaza.”

However, Hamas also urged mediators to ensure that Israel “fully implements the agreement’s requirements” without delay.

Challenges Ahead

While Trump celebrated what he called “the first steps toward a lasting peace,” he acknowledged that more difficult issues, including Hamas’ disarmament and the future governance of Gaza, would need to be addressed in subsequent negotiations.

The deal must now undergo formal approval by Israel’s cabinet, as required by law. There is a brief window for potential legal petitions before prisoner releases can proceed.

Conclusion

This diplomatic breakthrough represents a significant shift in the long-standing conflict between Israel and Hamas. It highlights the critical role of international mediation and the importance of sustained dialogue in achieving lasting peace. As the next steps unfold, the focus will remain on ensuring the successful implementation of the agreement and addressing the remaining challenges that lie ahead.

Orji Kalu Claims: 'I'm the Key Figure in the South East'

Orji Kalu Claims: 'I'm the Key Figure in the South East'

Political Rivalry in the South East

Dr. Orji Uzor Kalu, a former governor of Abia State and the Senate Chief Whip, has made a bold declaration that he is the most significant political figure in Nigeria’s South East geopolitical zone. His assertion challenges the growing perception that Peter Obi, the former governor of Anambra State, is emerging as a dominant political leader in the region.

During an interview on Politics Today on Channels Television, Kalu was asked whether he would support Obi in future elections. His response was firm and unambiguous. “I am a member of the APC, and I don’t want to discuss Peter Obi for any reason,” he said. He further emphasized that while he would be open to discussing his party's leadership, he would not engage in conversations about Obi.

When the interviewer pressed him on why he seemed uncomfortable whenever Obi's name was mentioned, Kalu maintained his position. “No, because I don’t want to discuss him. I’ve told you before, any day you want to discuss him with me, give us two hours and you’ll be the moderator. Keep it there, I’ll be able to sort it out.”

Kalu dismissed the idea that Obi is becoming the political leader of the South East. “He is not my leader. I am the most important politician from the South East zone. I won two states before on the platform of the Progressive Peoples Alliance (PPA). I’ve run for president before; my 4.9 million votes are still there,” he stated confidently.

He highlighted his political achievements, arguing that his track record far exceeds any influence Obi might have gained in recent years. “In 2007, we achieved a lot with PPA. We had ministers, ambassadors, and other key appointments under the late President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua,” Kalu added. “So you cannot be telling me who is or isn’t a leader. Anybody can run for president.”

Kalu’s comments come at a time when debates about political leadership and influence in the South East are intensifying. Obi has gained significant grassroots support following his strong performance in the 2023 presidential election. However, Kalu, a founding member of the All Progressives Congress (APC) and a two-time senator representing Abia North, insists that his political legacy and reach in the region remain unmatched.

Key Points from Kalu’s Statement

  • Kalu claims to be the most influential politician in the South East.
  • He refuses to engage in discussions about Peter Obi, even when directly questioned.
  • Kalu emphasizes his past achievements, including winning two states and receiving 4.9 million votes in a presidential election.
  • He highlights his role in the Progressive Peoples Alliance (PPA) during the presidency of Umaru Musa Yar’Adua.
  • Despite Obi’s growing popularity, Kalu asserts that his own political influence remains unparalleled.

Political Legacy and Influence

Kalu’s political journey has been marked by several milestones. As a former governor of Abia State, he played a crucial role in shaping the state’s development agenda. His tenure as Senate Chief Whip further solidified his position as a key player in Nigerian politics. Kalu’s ability to mobilize support across different regions has made him a formidable figure in the country’s political landscape.

His involvement in the formation of the All Progressives Congress (APC) also underscores his significance in the political arena. As a founding member, Kalu contributed to the party’s establishment and its subsequent rise to power. This historical context adds weight to his claim of being the most important politician in the South East.

Despite the challenges posed by rising political figures like Obi, Kalu remains confident in his influence. He believes that his extensive experience and proven track record make him a more credible leader in the region. His refusal to acknowledge Obi’s leadership status reflects a broader debate about who truly holds sway in the South East.

The Future of Political Leadership

As the political landscape continues to evolve, the question of leadership in the South East remains a topic of discussion. While Obi’s grassroots support and electoral success have positioned him as a potential leader, Kalu’s long-standing presence and achievements challenge this narrative.

The coming years may see a shift in how political influence is perceived in the region. With new leaders emerging and traditional power structures being redefined, the dynamics of political leadership in the South East will likely continue to change.

For now, Kalu’s declaration serves as a reminder of the complex and often competitive nature of Nigerian politics. Whether his claims hold true in the long run remains to be seen, but his confidence in his position is clear.

Minister Stresses Key Role of Execution in Africa's Tax Overhaul

Minister Stresses Key Role of Execution in Africa's Tax Overhaul

The Importance of Implementation in Public Financial Management

In Addis Ababa on October 8, 2025, the Revenues Minister Aynalem Nigussie emphasized that while developing policies and ambitious reforms in taxation and public financial management (PFM) is crucial, it is not enough on its own. She pointed out that the real impact of these initiatives depends on effective implementation, institutional capacity, and sustained political commitment across the African continent.

During the opening of the 11th Africa Think Tank Summit, the minister highlighted that experience has consistently shown that policy alone is insufficient. According to her, what Africa needs today is not only policy action but also the right implementation measures to ensure that reforms translate into tangible outcomes.

By addressing the disconnection between policy commitment and practical implementation, Africa can strengthen its economic governance, enhance public trust in institutions, and develop a strong and competent public financial management system.

Aynalem further stressed that effective domestic revenue mobilization is essential for African nations to sustainably invest in essential social services and productive sectors such as transport, energy, agriculture, and digital innovation. These sectors are key drivers of inclusive growth and long-term transformation.

She noted that robust public financial management and domestic resource mobilization are pillars of economic sovereignty. Additionally, she emphasized the importance of moving decisively from policy to action and from dependency to self-reliance.

Ethiopia’s Strategic Investments in Public Financial Management

The Revenues Minister mentioned that Ethiopia has made sustained and strategic investments in strengthening its public financial management system over several years. This effort reflects a commitment to building a more resilient and efficient fiscal framework.

Mamadou Biteye, Executive Secretary of the African Capacity Building Foundation (ACBF), echoed similar sentiments. He pointed out that the gap between policy targets and actual outcomes highlights the challenges of implementation. Strengthening citizen trust, improving service delivery, and enhancing administrative capacity are as critical as legal and policy frameworks or policy reforms, he said.

Biteye further noted that domestic resource mobilization is not just an economic necessity but also a matter of sovereignty, dignity, and freedom. Therefore, there is a pressing need to monitor implementation policies and ensure that reforms deliver results on the ground.

Think Tanks as Catalysts for Change

Zadig Abraha, President of the African Leadership Excellence Academy, stated that the role of think tanks is truly manifested where data becomes direction, where research becomes resolved, and where thought becomes transformation. This perspective underscores the importance of think tanks in driving meaningful change through evidence-based solutions.

The three-day summit, held under the theme “From Taxation to Action: Bridging Policy and Implementation in Public Financial Management in Africa,” aims to exchange insights on closing the gap between policy and implementation in PFM. It will also explore cutting-edge issues, including:

  • Digital taxation
  • Debt sustainability
  • Gender-responsive budgeting
  • Citizen engagement

These topics reflect the evolving landscape of public financial management and the need for innovative approaches to address contemporary challenges.

PM Abiy Meets Cypriot Foreign Minister to Strengthen Diplomatic Ties

PM Abiy Meets Cypriot Foreign Minister to Strengthen Diplomatic Ties

Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed Engages in Diplomatic Talks with Cypriot Foreign Minister


Addis Ababa, October 8, 2025 — Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed engaged in a series of discussions with Constantinos Kombos, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Cyprus. The meeting took place in Addis Ababa and focused on strengthening diplomatic ties and exploring opportunities for enhanced economic and political cooperation between the two nations.

“Following a busy field day in the Central Ethiopia Region, I had the pleasure of receiving Dr. Constantinos Kombos, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Cyprus, and his delegation at my office later this afternoon in Addis Ababa,” Prime Minister Abiy shared on social media channels. His remarks highlighted the significance of the visit and the importance of fostering closer relations between Ethiopia and Cyprus.

The talks covered a wide range of topics, including bilateral relations, regional security, and economic collaboration. Both leaders emphasized their commitment to deepening mutual understanding and working together on issues of common interest. The discussions also touched upon ways to enhance trade and investment between the two countries, as well as explore potential areas for joint development projects.

Key Areas of Discussion

  • Diplomatic Relations: The meeting provided an opportunity for both sides to reaffirm their commitment to maintaining strong diplomatic ties. The Prime Minister expressed confidence in the growing partnership between Ethiopia and Cyprus, highlighting the importance of regular high-level exchanges.

  • Economic Cooperation: A major focus of the talks was on expanding economic collaboration. The ministers discussed ways to increase trade volumes, attract foreign investment, and create new business opportunities for enterprises in both countries.

  • Political Dialogue: The conversation also included discussions on regional and international issues, where both leaders agreed on the need for multilateral cooperation to address challenges such as climate change, migration, and conflict resolution.

  • Cultural Exchange: In addition to political and economic matters, the dialogue included a discussion on cultural and educational exchanges. Both parties expressed interest in promoting people-to-people connections through academic programs, tourism, and cultural events.

Future Prospects

The meeting concluded with a sense of optimism and a shared vision for the future of Ethiopia-Cyprus relations. Both leaders agreed to maintain open channels of communication and to continue working towards concrete outcomes that benefit both nations.

Prime Minister Abiy reiterated Ethiopia’s openness to partnerships that contribute to sustainable development and regional stability. He also encouraged Cypriot businesses and investors to explore opportunities in Ethiopia, citing the country’s growing economy and strategic location.

Minister Kombos, in turn, praised Ethiopia’s progress and expressed appreciation for the warm hospitality extended during the visit. He emphasized Cyprus’ willingness to support Ethiopia in its development goals and to strengthen cooperation in various sectors.

Conclusion

The recent diplomatic engagement between Ethiopia and Cyprus marks an important step forward in building a more robust and cooperative relationship. As both nations navigate the complexities of the global landscape, the emphasis on collaboration and mutual respect will be key to achieving long-term success. With continued dialogue and practical initiatives, the partnership between Ethiopia and Cyprus is poised for further growth and impact.


Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (Syndigate.info).

Back To Top